Defence Minister Motshekga under scrutiny for SANDF withdrawal chaos
Defence and Military Veterans of South Africa Minister Angie Motshekga to be scrutinised over SANDF's disorganised exit from DRC peacekeeping mission
Image: IOL/Independent Newspapers
The Democratic Alliance (DA) has unveiled its intention to scrutinise Defence and Military Veterans Minister Angie Motshekga over what it characterises as a 'chaotic and poorly planned' withdrawal of South African National Defence Force (SANDF) troops from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).
In a statement issued on Wednesday, DA Defence & Military Veterans Spokesperson Chris Hattingh stated that the party will raise these concerns during the upcoming parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Defence, which is scheduled for May 9.
On Wednesday, South African military contingents began preparations to withdraw from the DRC following the signing of a landmark peace agreement between the DRC and Rwanda.
As the lead nation of the Southern African Development Community (SADC) peacekeeping mission in the DRC, South Africa has played a pivotal role in efforts to restore peace amid ongoing conflict.
However, the DA has raised serious concerns about the manner of the SANDF’s withdrawal, describing it as "chaotic and poorly coordinated."
The party notes that Parliament and the public have been kept in the dark about this mission’s conclusion.
Disorganised Exit Raises Alarm
The DA said it intends to use the upcoming committee meeting to question Minister Motshekga about the deployment and withdrawal of SANDF troops.
“Poor planning, vague objectives, and a disturbing lack of transparency have marred the withdrawal of South African troops from eastern DRC.
The SADC Mission in the DRC (SAMIDRC), which SADC officially terminated in March, is now withdrawing from strategic areas such as Goma and Sake—regions where South African forces remained after deadly clashes in January.
Lack of Transparency and On-the-Ground Reports
The DA raised concerns about a lack of transparency, stating that, to date, Parliament has received no official briefing on the withdrawal, and public awareness remains limited.
The party said there are reports that SANDF troops and Tanzanian and Malawian forces are withdrawing via Rwanda to Tanzania.
“Alarmingly, accounts suggest that M23 rebels—widely believed to be backed by Rwanda—are inspecting military equipment as convoys pass through.
“Members of the elite Quick Reaction Force (QRF) have described the experience as "frustrating and humiliating."
“It has emerged that safe passage for South African troops was negotiated with Rwanda after M23 seized control of key infrastructure, leaving many soldiers uncertain about their safety.
“Soldiers also continue to report logistical failures, poor communication, and concerns over the status of military vehicles and heavy weaponry.”
Hattingh highlighted that the situation is exacerbated by the loss of 14 South African soldiers during the Battle for Goma in January.
Questions for Minister Motshekga
During the May committee meeting, Hattingh said his party plans to pose several urgent questions to Minister Motshekga, including:
“What operational failures contributed to the disorganised withdrawal, and how is the Department ensuring the safety of remaining troops and equipment?
“What is the current status of SANDF assets in the DRC, including any missing, damaged, or compromised equipment?”
A Mission Marked by Sacrifice and Setbacks
Since taking the lead in SADC peacekeeping efforts in 2022, South Africa’s primary goal has been to support the Congolese government in stabilising eastern provinces plagued by rebel groups and ethnic tensions.
The mission faced a significant setback in January when SANDF soldiers lost 14 comrades during clashes with the M23 rebels over control of Goma, a key city in the eastern DRC.
IOL Politics